+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2010-04-05      浏览次数:2076次
CBDT wants jail term for tax evaders

Apr.05, 2010, 0139 hrs IST

 

NEW DELHI: Tax evasion could land you behind bars if the country’s direct taxes authority has its way. The central board of direct taxes wants

 

 to prosecute tax evaders under the tough anti-terror financing law, even as it looks to adopt a more friendly approach towards honest tax payers.

 

It has proposed to the department of revenue to bring offences such as concealment of income, not filing income tax returns, failure to deposit tax deducted at source and giving false evidence under the ambit of Prevention of Money Laundering Act or PMLA.

 

If these offences become scheduled offences under the anti-money laundering law, they will invite rigorous imprisonment of three to seven years and a fine of up to Rs 5 lakh. The trial will be faster in the case of offences under PMLA as these are tried in special courts and the accused has to prove that he is not guilty.

 

“The board has written to the Department of Revenue to include these as predicate offence under the PMLA,” a finance ministry official said. The department of revenue is an arm of the finance ministry that administers the money laundering law.

 

Under the current rules the income tax department has to take law ministry’s permission to initiate prosecution against tax evaders. The cumbersome procedure has meant that so far no evader has been put behind the bars although there is a provision for six months imprisonment and penalty on tax evasion. The tax authorities prefer not to invoke these provisions as prosecution could take many years.

 

“The income tax authorities have generally not launched prosecution and even in cases where prosecution have been launched, they have been compounded into fines,” said Amitabh Singh, partner at consulting firm Ernst & Young. “Considering the fact that assessing officers are hesitant to launch penalty proceedings for concealment of income or furnishing of wrong particulars, PMLA may acquire a draconian nature,” he said.

 

The authorities can also attach property derived or obtained as a result of a scheduled offence that may be confiscated and disposed of.

 

The amended money laundering law covers offences such as insider trading and market manipulation, human trafficking, smuggling of migrants, piracy and environmental crimes, over invoicing and under invoicing under customs inviting stricter punishment.

 

As on September 30, 2009 the total direct taxes dues were Rs 1,98,506 crore, including Rs 1,33,232 crore on account of corporate tax and Rs 65,274 crore from individuals. Of these arrears as much as Rs 1,85,437 crore is difficult to recover for various reasons. These include companies under liquidation, no assets or inadequate assets, stays given by courts and demand notified under special courts.

 

India has tightened its anti-money laundering law in line with the recommendation of the global anti-terror financing watchdog Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to gain its membership. Globally, many FATF nations also have these offences under their money laundering laws.

 

The FATF is evaluating whether India’s local laws meet its stipulations. Membership of this body will get India easy access to real-time exchange of information on money laundering and terror financing and a key global platform to raise pitch against export of terror.