+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2010-06-08      浏览次数:1948次
Developed Nations Accused Of Laundering $30b Climate Fund

Jun.07, 2010

 

Developed countries have been accused of not being sincere with their climate funding commitments.

 

A non-governmental organisation (NGO), Friends of the Earth International (FoI), has alleged at the ongoing United Nations Climate Talks in Bonn that much of the $30 billion fast-start fund promised is recycled aid money already committed for essential programmes in the developing world.

 

Describing the money as ‘grossly inadequate,’ the group urged the countries to alter their plans over climate funding to prevent a repeat of the fallout from Copenhagen. FoI chair, Nnimmo Bassey, said, “It seems developed countries are finally taking recycling seriously; they are recycling aid money and calling it ‘fresh’ money. But the world will not be fooled. Laundering aid money for climate change does not show leadership, it shows contempt.

 

“Having done the most to cause climate change, developed nations are morally and legally obliged to support the additional cost in developing countries for adaptation measures and for clean renewable technology.”

 

Officials of Tuvalu, a small island nation severely threatened by climate change, submitted that the Copenhagen Accord’s Green Fund was being used for coercive political purpose to get support for the weak provisions of the Accord. Along with some other developing countries, they expressed outrage over rich countries’ attempts to count existing commitments as new climate money, in contravention of agreed criterion of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

 

Alleging that rich nations were attempting to place control of climate funds with the World Bank, the FoI called for the establishment of a new global climate fund under the full authority of the UNFCCC, based on principles of equity and environmental integrity to support the aims of communities around the world.

 

Asad Rehman of the FoI in the United Kingdom stated, “The motivation of the United States and other developed countries is clear - they want the World Bank to call the shots. This is unacceptable. The World Bank is an undemocratic discredited institution that is far adept at causing climate change than preventing it.

 

The World Bank is the number one lender to environmentally and socially destructive projects around the globe, ranging from fossil fuel lending to subsiding deforestation.

 

 Most recently, it approved a new loan for South Africa to build the world’s 4th largest coal plant, described by South African civil society as an environmental and social disaster.”

 

Karen Orenstein of the FoI in the US noted, “People in developing countries are already being forced to cope with the impacts of climate population that the World Bank is causing, while efforts to reduce poverty - which the Bank purports to support - are undercut by the climate crisis. The best thing the World Bank can do is no harm in the first place. It must get out of the business of climate pollution.”

 

In a related development, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has urged delegates to the ongoing climate talks to establish a post-2012 global climate change regime. The organisation wants parties to strive to agree on the building blocks for a deal at the next UNFCCC Summit in Cancun in Mexico , this year.