+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2011-01-08      浏览次数:1653次
Money and diesel launderer's jail term appeal refused
关键字:money laundering

7 January 2011 Last updated at 16:56 GMT

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-12138884

 

A man who laundered hundreds of thousands of pounds has lost his appeal against being jailed for a year.

 

Senior judges rejected an argument that there was a disparity between the sentence imposed on Leonard Warwick and one of his co-accused.

 

Warwick, 42, pleaded guilty to 17 charges including evading VAT and concealing criminal profits.

 

He was sentenced last November for what was described as a "large scale" diesel and money laundering operation.

 

Warwick, a chronic alcoholic of low intelligence, was given 12 months in prison after he agreed to spend a further year on probation.

 

But his lawyers challenged the sentence on the basis that one of his co-accused, Anthony Michael Fox, 40, of Orritor Road, Cookstown received a suspended jail term.

 

Fox, who was described as driving oil-filled lorries for his father, had pleading guilty to evading the duty on diesel and concealing the proceeds of crime and criminal property.

 

It was set out how Warwick had been "exploited" to use his and other identities to open the various bank accounts.

 

Cog

 

The trial judge said that while he was "an important cog in the machine he was by no means an organiser".

 

Warwick had put a total of £685,000 through six accounts he set up.

 

Refusing his application on Friday, the Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to take the view that his culpability was greater than Anthony Fox's because he was involved in opening the accounts.

 

Lord Chief Justice Sir Declan Morgan also pointed to Warwick's "significant record" for dishonesty offences stretching back more than 20 years.

 

He said: "Having regard to the facts there were clearly two material distinctions between this appellant and Anthony Fox.

 

"It's our view that there is no sense of grievance which might be considered to be justified as a result of the fact the learned trial judge took a merciful view in imposing a suspended sentence on him (Fox)."