+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2024-12-13      浏览次数:482次
CoE MONEYVAL Releases Third Follow-Up Report

 

https://civil.ge/archives/643738

 

On December 11, the Council of Europe’s Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL) released its third Enhanced Follow-up Report and Technical Compliance Re-Rating on Georgia, examining the country’s progress in addressing the technical compliance deficiencies identified in the September 2020 assessment and subsequent follow-up reports on its measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. As a result of the follow-up, two recommendations have received an improved rating.

 

MONEYVAL is a permanent monitoring body of the Council of Europe, which works on evaluating compliance with international standards and their implementation, in the direction of combating money laundering and terrorism financing. Its previous reports on Georgia were released in 2020, and 2022.

 

According to the document, Georgia had requested a reassessment of eight of the forty recommendations contained in its comprehensive 2020 Mutual Evaluation Report (in particular R.1, R.6, R.7, R.15, R.22, R.23, R.28, R.35).

 

For the remaining recommendations rated as partially compliant (R.24, R.25) or non-compliant (R.8), the authorities did not request a re-rating. For now, Georgia is rated “compliant” on seven recommendations, “largely compliant” on 24 recommendations, “partially compliant” on eight recommendations, and “non-compliant” on one recommendation, which relates to non-profit organizations.

 

When it comes to recommendations number one on assessing risks and applying a risk-based approach, Georgia’s rating has improved from “partially compliant” to “largely compliant.” As for recommendation number fifteen on adopting new technologies, the rating also improved from “partially compliant” to “largely compliant.” Rating for other recommendations remains unchanged.

 

Georgia has not reached the threshold of addressing most, if not all, deficiencies, and so the plenary may decide in line with Rule 25 of the Rules of Procedure for the 5th round of mutual evaluations to apply compliance enhancing procedures to the following non-“big six” recommendations that remain: Partially Complaint – R.7, R.22, R.23, R.24, R.25, R.28 and R.35; and Non-Complaint – R.8.

 

Speaking of the unchanged rating on recommendation number six which is about targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing, the report recognizes that Georgia has made a “serious effort” in boosting its compliance with the UN instruments on freezing of terrorist assets. However, there are still some notable weaknesses in the system related to coverage of all natural and legal persons under freezing requirements. In a similar fashion, the rating on recommendation number seven on targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing remained the same.

 

In its justification not to change the rating on the recommendation number 22 regarding the designated non-financial business and professions (DNFBPs), the MONEYVAL identifies several shortcomings, including the fact that there are no Anti-Money Laundering/Combating of Terrorism (AML/CFT) financing requirements for real estate agents and trust and service company providers.

 

The real estate agents and trust and service company providers lacking anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism requirements is seen as a moderate issue, impacting recommendation number 23 compliance.

 

Regarding the recommendation number 28, the report reiterates that there is no regulation and supervision of real estate agents trust and service company providers. “There are no, or insufficient, provisions in place to prevent associates of criminals from owning or controlling casinos and sanctions are not always available in line with R.35 for failure to comply with AML/CFT requirements,” reads the report.

 

Recommendation number 35 on sanctions remained unchanged, because “sanctions are not available for breaches of the AML/CFT Law by leasing companies, lawyers (except suspension) and DPMS [dealers in precious metals and stones].”

 

Georgia will remain under the enhanced Follow-up process and is expected to report back to the plenary in one year’s time on the progress made in relation to recommendations remaining rated as PC and NC,” the report notes.