+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2023-11-18      浏览次数:716次
BREAKING: UBS fails to overturn guilty verdict in money laundering case – but France’s top court orders re-trial over €1.8BN fine

 

https://www.amlintelligence.com/2023/11/breaking-frances-top-court-orders-re-trial-over-e1-8bn-fine-against-ubs-for-allegedly-promoting-money-laundering/

 

FRANCE’s top court today (Wednesday) ruled a new trial should be held over a €1.8BN ($1.95 billion) fine against UBS for promoting illegal banking services and money laundering in the country.

 

The court, which also upheld the guilty verdict against the bank, said a new trial would need to take place at the Paris appeals court to determine a new fine, if any.

 

The ruling reverses and annuls the decision of the Paris Court of Appeal from Dec. 13, 2021, but only insofar as it relates to penalties and civil interests, all other provisions being expressly maintained, the court said.

 

UBS’s shares, which were already up on the day, spiked as much as 3% more after news broke that the 1.8 billion-euro fine was struck down. However, they then erased those gains and more, to last stand up around 1.6%.

 

The decision by the Cour de Cassation, France’s highest judicial court, means the guilty verdict on UBS is final. The court said a new trial over penalties was needed because the previous decision on the fine did not follow all the correct legal procedures.

 

UBS said it was disappointed the court had upheld the overall verdict against it, adding it continued to maintain that it acted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, and would defend itself in the forthcoming trial.

 

The ruling once again extends uncertainty over the fine for the Swiss bank, which sought to overturn the verdict and penalty for having wooed wealthy French clients into hiding undeclared funds in Swiss bank accounts between 2004 and 2012.

 

UBS may be able to partially reduce the 1.1bn euros of provisions currently set aside (for the case),” Keefe, Bruyette & Woods said in a note to clients before the ruling was released.

 

However, we would caveat that a new trial may lead to a final settlement above or below the 1.8bn euros,” it said, adding that it expected the case to take “multiple years” to come to an end.

 

LEGAL SAGA

 

The legal saga has lasted for more than a decade and saw some of the bank’s representatives grilled by French judges.

 

The 1.8 billion-euro fine ordered two years ago against UBS in France was less than half an initial overall penalty of 4.5 billion imposed on the bank after a first trial in 2019.

 

It is comprised of a 1 billion-euro penalty and 800 million euros in damages owed to the French state.

 

UBS reported in its third quarter results that it had put aside over $4 billion in provisions for litigation and regulatory matters, roughly half of which is for Credit Suisse. It estimated that the financial implications from the French case alone would come to 1.1 billion euros.

 

France’s top court reviewed whether the Paris appeals court ruling had complied with the law, not the facts that underpinned its decision.

 

UBS remains involved in a string of litigation and regulatory matters including claims related to the sale of mortgages and residential mortgage-backed securities in the United States.

 

It also assumed a number of cases from Credit Suisse when it officially took over its former rival and has already settled a number of those, such as with Mozambique over the decade-old $1.5 billion-plus “tuna bond” scandal