+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2011-07-27      浏览次数:1198次
Anti-money laundering trends moving to enterprise application
关键字:money laundering

Long-term goal is to integrate AML and anti-fraud efforts

July 26, 2011

http://www.ababj.com/tech-topics-plus/anti-money-laundering-trends-moving-to-enterprise-application-2151.html

 

Spending on anti-money laundering compliance, including operations and technology, will reach $5.8 billion globally in 2013, including $1.4 billion on internal and external technology spending, according to Celent’s new report, “Trends in Anti-Money Laundering 2011.”

 

Key findings of the report include:

 

Celent estimates in 2011 operations accounts for $3.8 billion and technology, including internal and external IT spending, makes up the other $1.2 billion. Of the technology spending, packaged AML software will reach $458 million in 2011. Celent projects that the overall AML compliance burden will expand at a rate of 7.8% annually. Global spending on AML software will expand at a rate of 10.4% annually, to $557 million in 2013.

 

Nearly ten years after 9/11, AML compliance continues to evolve, due to increasing regulatory demands on the one hand and developing organization and technology best practices by financial institutions on the other. As a result, the cost of running an AML compliance program continues to rise. Faced with increasing pressures in terms of both compliance and costs, financial institutions are seeking efficiencies in operations and technology. This need to achieve greater efficiencies is driving a trend towards centralization and standardization of AML operations, as well as integration of AML and anti-fraud programs.

 

Most respondents to Celent’s survey (42%) cited regulatory requirements as the main driver for AML compliance. However, a substantial segment (25%) named reputational risk and protecting the brand as the primary purpose of their AML efforts. In practice, these drivers are interdependent.

 

Increasingly, financial institutions are responding to challenges by adopting elements of an enterprisewide compliance approach, with the ultimate-and quite long-term-goal of integrating their AML and antifraud operations and technologies across business silos and, for multinational firms, geographical regions.

 

Financial institutions need to carefully assess the vendor solutions that can assist them. Aside from the vendor's ability to deliver on implementation and after service, the three main areas institutions will want to evaluate are scalability, sophistication of analytics, and case management capabilities. Needs in these areas will differ according to the size of the institution, business line, and existing solutions and compliance procedures already in place. Smaller institutions may not need, or even be able to effectively use, a very advanced solution, whereas top-tier institutions may require sophisticated data mining and analytics just to keep track of their large volumes of transactions and accounts. Institutions will know their own scalability needs, but should be careful to perform due diligence on the claims made by vendors.

 

Once a solution meets the institution’s analytics and scalability requirements, strong case management functionality is crucial. The biggest headache compliance departments face is how to sift through the voluminous alerts generated by AML systems, divvy them up among their analysts, and investigate them effectively. These difficulties will be amplified when antifraud and AML are placed on the same platform, making strong case management capabilities even more urgent.

 

Building the business case for an enterprisewide approach to compliance is not easy. To justify the investment, compliance officers will need to gather evidence from case studies of other financial institutions that the new antifraud products of AML vendors are effective and can produce incremental improvements in loss prevention enough to create an ROI. Top management and board buy-in to the initiative is important in overcoming political divisions and resistance from siloed business lines and units. Finally, a phased roadmap, perhaps starting with a centralized case management system to unite disparate legacy AML and antifraud systems, will help provide a workable and achievable blueprint for the journey towards enterprisewide compliance.