+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2010-09-25      浏览次数:1755次
NZ Law Society comments on anti-money laundering regulations
关键字:money laundering

LawFuel -The Law Jobs and Legal NewsWire

http://www.lawfuel.co.nz/releases/release.asp?NewsID=2080

 

24 September 2010 - The consultation timeframe allowed for draft regulations and codes of practice related to new anti-money laundering legislation is of some concern to the New Zealand Law Society.

 

In a submission on a Ministry of Justice consultation document on regulations and codes of practice for the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009, the Society says it supports the implementation of the new regime and the manner in which the ministry and regulators have sought industry and professional feedback.

 

However, the Society says the consultation document indicates that it is expected that final decisions will be made on the regulations in September, and the regulations gazetted in December 2010.

 

“The Society considers that consultation on the draft regulations is essential and that sufficient time should be allowed for this,” it says. “The regulations will deal with a number of matters in more detail than the consultation document. In addition, in some instances new obligations will be introduced by the regulations (such as the inclusion of trust and company service providers as reporting entities.”

 

The Society says a consultation period of less than five weeks would be undesirable with respect to the draft regulations, and the ministry’s practice of inviting interested parties to meet with it to discuss any concerns they have should apply.

 

The submission says the Law Society supports the introduction of the Act, with progressive implementation of obligations. It says the proposed timeframe of two years from the gazetting of regulations for all obligations under the Act to take effect for Tranche One entities, will provide entities with a realistic timeframe for undertaking risk assessments, and preparation and implementation of compliance programmes