+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2010-01-22      浏览次数:2474次
Report in Favour of Defendants 
in Money Laundering Case

Jan.22, 2010

 

A report presented recently by the Public Prosecution to a Misdemeanours Court came in favour of the defendants in a £150 million money laundering case.


According to the report, which was prepared by a Dubai Police special committee, there is no proof that the defendants, including an Emirati, a British, an Indian, a Pakistani and seven firms were involved in money laundering. The committee, comprised officers of the Organised Crime Section, inspection officers at the UAE Central Bank as well as a prosecutor, said in its report that there is no decisive evidence to incriminate the four defendants and the firms currently on trial in the money laundering case.

 

Defence counsel Eissa Bin Haidar who represents the Emirati, the British — both business partners — and the Pakistani manager, requested the court to be granted some time to prepare his defence arguments.

 

The case is the biggest of its kind in recent times dating back to August 2006 when the Organised Crime Section of the Dubai Police was tipped off about the involvement of some individuals and firms in Dubai in money-laundering operations. The firms’ statements of accounts suggested that there was a suspicious flow of funds and huge amounts totalling £150 million, the prosecutors said.

 

Bin Haider of Bin Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants earlier asked the court how the authorities could jail individuals and freeze their assets while there is no proof to incriminate them.

 

“Obviously, the case facts took place in 2007 and 2008 while my clients were jailed and their assets frozen in 2006,” Bin Haider earlier argued in the court.

 

Prosecutors found that the funds were transferred between the firms’ accounts here and other accounts in European countries. The alleged money laundering supposedly happened in a European country while there is still no registered case in that particular country, the lawyer said.

 

The report by the Dubai Police committee came negative as to any proof found against them. The special panel earlier received an audit report by an expert from the British Income and Customs Authority, which did not say that the defendants swindled the UK Treasury. The panel knew that the British expert has not been able to determine the source of the funds transferred to two companies in Dubai.

 

Dubai Public Prosecution believes that the funds (£150 million) were made by cheating the Income and Customs Departments in two European countries whereas the defendants were trading in merchandise through fictitious contracts in order to raise the products’ market value and then re-export the same merchandise.

 

They would change the names of their companies and their commercial activities every now and then. They would also transfer huge amounts of money through individuals and money exchange agencies to different parties without legal documents.

 

The defendants allegedly submitted forged documents to UAE Central Bank to justify nearly Dh18 million found in one of the companies owned by 
the suspects. Earlier, they all pleaded not guilty to money laundering and forgery charges.