+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2013-10-29      浏览次数:632次
ED files complaint of money-laundering against Satyam accused
关键字:money laundering

Updated: October 29, 2013 02:47 IST

http://www.thehindu.com/business/Industry/ed-files-complaint-of-moneylaundering-against-satyam-accused/article5281587.ece

 

 A new prosecution will begin in the nearly five-year-old Satyam Computer scam for criminal action against 47 persons and 166 corporate entities, headed by the former chairman B. Ramalinga Raju, on charges of money-laundering. The Enforcement Directorate filed a complaint in a court here on Monday and named the accused.

 

This will be in addition to 355 pieces of property of Raju and his family, totalling over 4,000 acres, worth Rs. 1,075 crore, which the ED acquired after passing attachment orders in six batches. The orders were confirmed by the adjudicating authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

 

It took two years for the ED to launch criminal prosecution under the PMLA because it was not clear which court should be designated to handle the complaint. In normal circumstances, the ED was supposed to file the complaint in a Metropolitan Sessions Judge (MSJ) court, but the criminal aspect of the case, handled by the Central Bureau of Investigation was under a special court presided over by an Assistant Sessions Judge, who was lower in rank than the MSJ.

 

The law says the cases of both the CBI and the ED should be tried in the same court. Moreover, the Supreme Court made it clear that the CBI’s case be conducted daily. In order not to disrupt the trial in the special court, the agencies approached the Supreme Court, which left the matter to the High Court. The High Court designated the special court to receive the ED’s complaint because the judge was a competent authority, though he was junior to the MSJ.

 

In addition to the CBI and the ED, the Serious Fraud Investigation Office of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs is trying the erstwhile directors of the company, in an economic offences court for violation of the company law.

 

It is the ED’s case that Raju and his family held the “proceeds of crime,” acquired through the sale of 5.5 crore shares at an inflated value of Rs. 600 a share. The money was used to buy land and to pump money into the company. The 47 individuals named by the ED include five family members and 32 friends of Raju.