+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2010-03-19      浏览次数:2313次
Four Acquitted in £150m Money Laundering Case Mary Nammour

Mar.19, 2010

 

DUBAI — The Court of Misdemeanours acquitted on Thursday an Emirati, a British (both business partners), an Indian accountant, and a Pakistani manager of the charge of money laundering in a case seen as the biggest of its kind involving around £150 million.

 

The court panel presided by Judge Abdel Majid Al Nezami cleared also seven firms of the same charge. However, the court sentenced the four defendants to two months in jail each for forgery and ordered confiscation of about Dh18 million which was seized from them.

 

According to the case, the Organised Crime Section of Dubai Police was tipped off in August 2006 about the involvement of some individuals and firms in Dubai in money-laundering operations. The firms’ statements of accounts suggested that there were suspicious flow of funds, totalling £150 million.

 

A report presented recently by the Public Prosecution to the court came in favour of the defendants.

 

According to the report, prepared by a Dubai Police special committee comprising officers of the Organised Crime Section and inspection officers at the UAE Central Bank as well as prosecutors, there has been no proof to incriminate the defendants of money laundering. The alleged money laundering supposedly happened in a European country while there is still no registered case in that particular country, the defence lawyer said. “It could not be established that the big funds found were gained from a crime,” advocate Eissa Bin Haidar argued.

 

The committee could not track down the source of the funds transferred to two companies in Dubai — whether these funds were made by commercial transactions in sale and purchase of mobile phones between companies or whether they were ill-gained funds.

 

The Dubai Public Prosecution believed that the funds were made by cheating the Income and Customs Departments in two European countries where the defendants were trading in merchandise through fictitious contracts to raise the products’ market value and then re-export the same merchandise.

 

They would also transfer huge amounts of money through individuals and money exchange agencies to different parties without legal documents.

 

To cover these transfers, the defendants allegedly submitted forged documents to the UAE Central Bank to justify over Dh18 million found in the account of one of the companies owned by the defendants.